- Eleanore Jenks
- Aug 3
- 6 min read
Is Hair Everything?
by bela davidson
Hair is everything. Don’t shoot the messenger.
I have been bald before, against my will. After I was done being bald
against my will, I started the process of growing my hair back from
scratch, from beneath the scalp, or as I came to think of it, from
beyond the grave. My beyond-the-grave hair grew in soft and fine
like a baby’s. This hair was 0 years old and was completely different
from the hair I was familiar with, which was already 15 years old by
the time it up and left me. My 0 year old hair did not cooperate with
me. It sprung up from the scalp and into the world, and then
flattened out in a tantrum, heavy and fearful, in stubborn response
to the indelicate chemical touch of my shampoo, or conditioner, or,
god forbid, my curl-keeping cream. It was infuriatingly unresilient
and sensitive to the elements and no matter what I tried, it always
looked bad. I always looked bad. For two years. Because it took
around two years for me to slowly grow out the beyond-the-grave
hair and in its place sprout stronger, thicker, better hair. Two years of
bad hair, which compounded on the year I served in Bald Jail. And
Bald Jail (being bald against my will) was an exceptionally pervasive
form of self-image torture. If hair wasn’t everything, this might have
all been fine, but it wasn’t, so I became distraught about it.
Even though I became distraught about it, I am not raging against
the Hair Machine. If I wanted to dethrone Hair from its ruling
position over my social, cultural and personal identities, I would have
to admit myself back into Bald Jail, but this time, proudly. However,
to become Bald again (Bald, capital B) would require so much effort
it might actually undermine the anti-beauty-standard message of the
campaign. A buzz cut is not Bald. That is still hair. Bald capital B
means uprooting hairs from follicles, and this also includes eyebrows
and eyelashes, which I swear no one considers when they think about
baldness. That all-encompassing baldness is the kind of Bald I was.
Now that I have eyebrows, I feel super un-Bald and I marvel at them
every morning in the mirror. I watch young women on Tiktok use a
filter to scrub their foreheads blank and ogle at how freaky they look
without eyebrows. I get it. I felt the same way when my eyebrows of
15 years up and left me. So, I am not anti-hair. But I do feel
strangely arrested in the orbit of Planet Hair. I think we all feel it,
even just dormantly. You only realize the sheer and inexplicable
power of your hair once it is gone.
I pulled a muscle in my foot a few weeks ago. I was limping across
Kings Cross and becoming stressed. I got home and googled my
symptoms. It only took a couple of days of marinating for me to
start mourning my hair. Again. Because I am constantly
preemptively mourning my hair. There is this volatile train-of-
thought that carries an anxious or preoccupied person (me) to
extreme or irrational conclusions (bald). The issue of the sore foot
was mostly arbitrary, but it was a ticket onto the health anxiety
vehicle. In which I travelled and docked at Bald station, once again.
The way I’m speaking about the train falsely takes the onus off of
the self, as if I am just a victim of the vehicle, but in reality, I am
pretty active in perpetuating my own neuronal pitfall. The neuronal
pitfall I’m referring to is conclusion-lead-research. Like that game
Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, where you make the shortest chain of
celebrity connections to get to Kevin Bacon, starting from some
arbitrary famous person. Like Liza Minelli to Kevin Bacon, or Elon
Musk to Kevin Bacon. People form connections. People play
connection games. I can’t help but play Six Degrees of Bald every
single time I have a sore foot, or anything akin to a sore foot.
There’s a poem that plays the connection game really masterfully,
McDonalds is Impossible by Chelsea Martin. The poem tumbles
through a series of constrained conditions, ‘if ’ this thing happens,
‘then’ this other thing must certainly happen. When I was in high
school I took some computer science classes, and I’m not going to
attempt to convince you that I know anything about computer
science, but thinking about action and consequence within the
programming if/then conditional framework is helpful, because you
are forced to design the flow of logic from scratch. If you press
‘space’, then the game will start. If you press ‘X’, then the game will
end. Importantly, there is also an ‘else’ condition in this structure,
which is supposed to account for all other possibilities that you didn’t
otherwise specify: Else you press ‘A’ or ’S’ or ‘D’ or ‘F’ or any other
key on the keyboard, instead of ‘X’ or ‘space’, an error message pops
up, or some other thing happens. Omitting the ‘else’ condition is bad
practice because you can’t anticipate your human user, who has free
will, to behave predictably. You prepare for all possibilities.
Otherwise, your program crash lands. In McDonalds is Impossible,
Martin omits the ‘else’ condition, but this is fine because the user
(the reader) is guided by hand through the flow of the poem. It is a
journey with a singular, gravitational destination, all the way down
the spinning vortex. In my poem Foot-to-Bald Connection, I did
want to give the reader some choice, which will change how the
poem is read from person to person, but I still omit the ‘else’. This
was my attempt at a choose-your-own-adventure style poem, but
with a single funnelling ending: the only conclusion is that hair is
everything and you should start mourning now.
So now I’ll speak more about that single funneling ending, about
why I think Hair is Everything. For most of my life, my hair was the
most noticeable physical trait about me, so it became one of my sole
identifiers. It was big and took up space and impossible to ignore.
My hair was so much of an identifying trait that when it was
completely wet (darkened and flattened), I was told I looked
unrecognizable. So, my hair was very personal. Alice Walker wrote a
piece called Oppressed Hair, which speaks a bit about hair’s cultural
and personal powers. Walker speaks about the healing act of
embracing her hair and allowing it to grow freely and uninhibited
with her person, even humanizing her love for it: “I found it to be
springy, soft, almost sensually responsive to moisture. As the little
braids spun off in all directions but the ones I tried to encourage
them to go, I discovered my hair's willfulness, so like my own! I saw
that my friend hair, given its own life, had a sense of humor.” So hair
is a friend, but it is also something more precious. How many
religious and spiritual practices acknowledge the sacredness and
power of a woman’s hair? I’m thinking of head coverings, hijabs for
Muslim women and sheitels for orthodox Jewish women. Hair is
under sacred protection, or at least there is some highly spiritual tie
between hair and gender, personhood and social positioning. What is
most interesting to me, though, is that despite all of this, hair is a
separate thing from the self. There is no blood coursing through it’s
strands. It is not a limb. Hair is somehow separate from the self and
it is the self. Hair is like a friend and hair is like your baby and hair is
you you you, everything.
There is no graceful way for me to fully resolve the theme of health
anxiety, because it is something impossible to predict or contain. The
same way that hair is steeped in all of these potent cultural and
personal significances, for me, hair is a heady representation of
health and freedom. Hair is Everything means Health is Everything,
and Freedom is Everything. Sickness is Not Everything, and Being
stripped of Choice is Not Everything, I just cannot live that way, so
as long as the reverse is true, that train will soar forwards and
forwards and upwards and fearlessly over these tricky, tempting
sinkhole stations. I’ll leave you with this Alice Walker quote about
hair and freedom and joy: “Again I stood in front of the mirror and
looked at myself and laughed. My hair was one of those odd,
amazing, unbelievable, stop-you-in-your-tracks creations--not unlike
a zebra's stripes, an armadillo's ears, or the feet of the electric-blue-
footed boobie--that the Universe makes for no reason other than to
express its own limitless imagination. I realized I had never been
given the opportunity to appreciate hair for its true self. That it did,
in fact, have one.”
コメント